Friday, June 06, 2008
The Covenant Family
I've been studying my Bible again... yep, a dangerous thing to do. You never know what might happen when you do that. Just think of the history -- the Reformation, the Great Awakening. Worlds get turned upside down.

Have you ever basically believed something your whole life, but never knew that anyone else had actually put it to words? Kind of nice when you find out what you thought you were reading in your Bible is actually one of the historical doctrines of the Church. Very nice, indeed.
And I will establish My covenant between Me and you and your descendants after you in their generations, for an everlasting covenant, to be God to you and your descendants after you.
Genesis 17:7

What a promise! God promised to be not only Abraham's God, but also the God of his descendants. What more could you want?

God has just told Abraham that all that He is, He will be for Abraham. And not only for Abraham, but also for his descendants.

Now, yes, there is more to the Abrahamic covenant than this. Yes, there was a promise of land, too. But don't miss that there is definitely a spiritual relationship established here between God, Abraham, and Abraham's children. God is relating to Abraham as an individual and also to Abraham's family.
But the mercy of the LORD is from everlasting to everlasting
On those who fear Him,
And His righteousness to children's children,
To such as keep His covenant,
And to those who remember His commandments to do them.

Psalm 103:17-18

God's mercy is eternal. Most of us have about seventy to eighty years to live. Not even Methuselah lived for eternity, past to future. (I speak as on earth). Yet, God's mercy is eternal. Its the full breadth of eternity. For as long as He has existed, for as long as He will exist, there is His mercy. It will outlive you.

But is His mercy for everyone? Well, no. It is for those who fear Him. It is for those who keep His covenant. For those who keep His commands, without which they would not be keeping His covenant. "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love, having predestined us to adoption as sons by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will, to the praise of the glory of His grace, by which He made us accepted in the Beloved" (Ephesians 1:3-6). "For whom He foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren. Moreover whom He predestined, these He also called; whom He called, these He also justified; and whom He justified, these He also glorified" (Romans 8:29, 30).

But look who else receives His mercy: "And His righteousness to children's children." "The children of Your servants will continue, And their descendants will be established before You" (Psalm 102:28). If the children will also keep His covenant, then His mercy is upon them to a thousand generations.

Can they keep His covenant unless they be in His covenant?

Now, I'm not suggesting that the children of Abraham were automatically born saved. But what the Bible clearly teaches here is that the Covenant extended to the covenant-keeper's children. It is a Covenant with the individual and with the individual's family.

Israel certainly understood the family aspect of the Covenant. The Israelites automatically assumed that their children were under the Covenant. The child could grow up and break covenant, yes, but at birth they were in the Covenant if the parents' were covenant-keepers.

Now, that's the Abrahamic Covenant. What about the New Covenant? Does any of this carry over?

The Israelites also misapplied the family aspect of the Covenant, and thought the Covenant was their birthright even if they broke it. Paul said to them, "Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham." (Galatians 3:7)

He goes on, "Brethren, I speak in the manner of men: Though it is only a man's covenant, yet if it is confirmed, no one annuls or adds to it. Now to Abraham and his Seed were the promises made. He does not say, "And to seeds," as of many, but as of one, "And to your Seed," who is Christ. And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect. For if the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer of promise; but God gave it to Abraham by promise." (Galatians 3:15-18)

(Notice that Paul includes the Mosaic Covenant within the Abrahamic Covenant.) The Abrahamic Covenant is fulfilled in Christ, the Seed. It is still in force, but now it is in force in Christ. If I am ingrafted into Christ, then I am in the Covenant.

That Covenant was with individuals and with families. As an individual, I am in Christ and I am in the Covenant. Also, my family is in the Covenant. I did not say that my family is automatically saved. Being in the Covenant and being saved are not identical.

But wait, am I just taking something from the Old Covenant and applying that to the New Covenant? Is that ever done in the New Testament (as if the above example from Galatians 3 does not suffice?)

When Peter was empowered by the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, he preached, "Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit" (Acts 2:38).

We've got that, right? We know that you repent to be saved. But he did go on, "For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call" (Acts 2:39). It's the family again! God's covenantal relationship with the family of the believer continues into the New Covenant! Did Israelites in the Old Covenant have to believe to be saved? Yes. Do the children of believers have to believe to be saved in the New Covenant? Yes. But was the Covenant also with the children of believers in both the Old Covenant and the New Covenant? Yes!!

Here's a passage that always stumped me:
But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace. For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?
1 Corinthians 7:12-16

Sanctified? Holy? Huh?
Here is the Covenant Family. If you are a believer, then your family is in the Covenant. Are they automatically saved? No. Are they in a relationship with God? Yes. There is grace in your home. God is the God of your family. If you will keep covenant with God, if they will keep covenant with God, that blessing continues to be passed down. If you or they break covenant, then we see that that individual is clearly not saved and under God's curse as a covenant-breaker.

Here's one way I would like to apply this. I have read parenting books that refer to your children as little pagans. Sorry, wrong, that's not true. Are they unsaved? Do they need a Savior? Yes. Are they pagans? No. God is their God and they are in Covenant with Him. They are in a special relationship with God.

I'm sure there will be comments on this one.
 
  posted at 11:54 AM  
  Comments (4)


4 Comments:
At 12:22 PM, Blogger Hannah said...

Really? You're positive that there will be comments?
Well, here's your first.

 
At 12:27 PM, Blogger Brian said...

Don't make me say, "I told you so."

 
At 12:59 PM, Blogger BenA said...

I'm predestined to comment.

I would have liked to see you go further with the capability of one to stay in covenant.

It seems as if the argument is laid at the works of individuals while God is simply on the side of lawyer governing a contract watching the action.

But perhaps I intrude upon post one in a series.

 
At 1:11 PM, Blogger Brian said...

Not at all, and I was looking forward to your comment.

The great blessing is not because I'm a great father or my wife is a great mother or my children are great children. The blessing is because our great God has made the Covenant with us and our children.

Just as I cannot trust myself for my salvation, I cannot trust myself for the Covenant.

Let me try to explain it this way. The Holy Spirit regenerates a man, opening his heart to the gospel. That man is presented with his own sinfulness and need of a Savior and he throws himself on the mercy of Christ. He is now saved. He is also now placed in the Covenant and the promise is to him and to his children.

Now his wife gives birth to a beautiful child. This baby is also in the covenant.

Let me say this from God's perspective... God has chosen this man from the foundation of the world to be His adopted child. This man is now saved and that good work which God began in him will continue through to glorification. This man will NOT break covenant because it is God who is at work within him.

Now God has promised to be God to this man and to his children. This is a Covenant relationship. God has not guaranteed to this man that He will save his children. However, He is in a relationship with these children.

Now from our perspective: If this child grows up and keeps covenant, trusting in Jesus as his father did, we know that this child was elect of God.

On the other hand, should this child grow up and reject Jesus, then we have two options: 1) he may yet prove to be elect if he repents and trusts in Jesus. 2) he may prove to not be elect and a covenant-breaker.

This is the difference between the visible church and the invisible Church. A child born to a Christian is a member of the visible church, although he may prove to not be a member of the invisible Church.

I hope that clarified things.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home



About Me
Name: Brian
Location: Southern United States

According to Kingdomality.com, I'm a White Knight. Think the Lone Ranger or Joan of Arc...

My complete profile
My Bible Reading Plan Locations of visitors to this page

Daily Bible Verse

Provided by Christ Notes Bible Search

Today's Grace Gem

Recent Posts
  •   Postmodern

  •   In darkness, light?

  •   Memorial Day

  •   New art

  •   Newt Gingrich on Adolescence

  •   A Fool's Anger

  •   Stuck in my head

  •   And they wonder...

  •   Don't make me angry

  •   Laminin


  • Westminster Bookstore
    Theology
  • Belgic Confession
  • Heidelberg Catechism
  • Canons of Dort
  • Westminster Confession of Faith A.D. 1647 (with Scripture proofs)
  • Matthew Henry Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible
  • Christ of the Covenants

  • Other Blogs
  • Daughter of Hope
  • Ben Acord
  • A Puritan's Mind
  • Bluebird Blogs
  • Challies
  • Doodles on Paper
  • Doug Phillips's Blog
  • Enjoy the Journey
  • Following Jesus
  • League of Reformed Bloggers
  • Monergism
  • The Price of Liberty
  • Proverbs 19:20
  • Scott Brown Online
  • White Open Spaces

  • Ministry Links
  • Ligonier Ministries
  • Geerhardus Vos
  • Christian Classics Ethereal Library
  • Covenant Family Fellowship
  • Jews Against Zionism
  • John Owen
  • D.M. Lloyd-Jones

  • Fun Stuff
  • Lark News
  • Purgatorio
  • Sacred Sandwich
  • Tominthebox News Network

  • Archives
  •   December 2005

  •   January 2006

  •   February 2006

  •   May 2006

  •   June 2006

  •   July 2006

  •   September 2006

  •   October 2006

  •   November 2006

  •   December 2006

  •   January 2007

  •   February 2007

  •   March 2007

  •   April 2007

  •   May 2007

  •   June 2007

  •   July 2007

  •   August 2007

  •   September 2007

  •   October 2007

  •   November 2007

  •   December 2007

  •   January 2008

  •   February 2008

  •   March 2008

  •   April 2008

  •   May 2008

  •   June 2008

  •   July 2008

  •   August 2008

  •   September 2008


  • Credits
    Blog Design by:


    Powered by:


    Images from:
    istockphoto